maybe it's becasue im a girl, but the first think i see when i look at this picture is her hair.
From:
smNU
(Fri Oct 22 09:54:39 2004)
maybe if you want this to actually sell something they should incorporate more clothes...
From:
TANU
(Sat Oct 23 09:39:29 2004)
CK is too sexually explicit on this one. Women should not be treated as an animal.
From:
AG NU
(Sun Oct 24 19:02:08 2004)
What exactly are they selling in this ad? I understand that it's for Calvin Klein, but other than that... what is going on?
From:
ideal
(Wed Feb 2 23:04:40 2005)
this is an ad for underwear right? well that's exactly what is is advertising. however, she does look insecure and her body pose looks sort of ... unhappy with herself?
From:
jenmeg
(Sun Feb 6 17:26:18 2005)
its an underwear add..wat do u suppose she should wear???
From:
djd
(Thu Feb 10 08:59:50 2005)
Why not just show the product WITHOUT a model? You would never see a male model in this position, and IF you did people would label it gay male porn.
From:
meg
(Wed Feb 16 10:47:22 2005)
an appeal for proctologists, doggy stylers, yoga masters
From:
Meaty Gonzales
(Sat Feb 26 13:00:31 2005)
First thing I don't like is the vulnerable bent-over hands tucked underbody pose, but even more disturbing and even weird - Calvin Klein's logo here looks to be cut out of construction paper and written in crayon....
...any body else see this as creepy?
From:
debasser
(Fri Apr 8 07:29:37 2005)
isnt it mimiking the pose of a baby to emphasise the cuteness and simplicity of the underwear. p.s ive never seen so many ill thought out ideas than on this website.
From:
ali
(Tue Apr 12 14:42:02 2005)
i think ck is way too explicit with women portryaed as sex symbools.
From:
ccca
(Fri Apr 15 10:54:47 2005)
oh my god am i the only one who slept like this as a child?? try this next time you cant sleep... it stretches you out and i guarantee if you can get in this position youll fall asleep in it.
From:
hannah
(Wed Jun 8 00:00:29 2005)
she looks like an insecure animal
From:
Lady
(Wed Jun 15 14:17:06 2005)
Ermm... Ok, this one looks really silly.
From:
...
(Wed Sep 14 15:14:45 2005)
I'm a very sexual female, and even I find this offensive to women. We are not submissive dogs.
From:
whee
(Tue Oct 4 08:59:08 2005)
her face remind me of kira Knightly to be honest maybe it is!!!
From:
zen
(Fri Dec 2 08:59:11 2005)
It's weird, because her body looks a malnourished 12 year old boy. cover her face up - the gender is not obvious. -zen
From:
jonny psycho
(Sun Feb 12 14:24:28 2006)
and how are you supposed to sell underwear and not look sexy?
cos then you wouldn't sell it
From:
demonista
(Fri Feb 24 10:54:27 2006)
oh, yeah cuz the only reason someone ever buys ANYTHING is because the advertisements for it show objectified women.
i buy underwear because it's a needed part of clothing, it's price, whether it's sweatshop made, whether it's comfortable, whether it looks good, etc.
From:
comicbookguy
(Fri Feb 24 20:27:43 2006)
Look at her, she doesn't have the body of a woman, she's more child-like than anything (the plain white underwear, covering her lips all seem 12ish as well as the font used for CK). When I look at it I see soft child pornography, but hey whatever sells the product (note my sarcasm).
Description
:
In Animal Kingdom this position is entitled: presenting.
Image Archives
